Secession: Why some in Oregon want to become part of Idaho_我的网站
A | Mike McCarter knows his American history almost as well as he knows his Bible. His family has lived and worshipped in Oregon for four generations. "The only time I lived out of the state was during the Vietnam War when I was in the military," he said.But his Oregon may not be the Oregon you're thinking of, the one with the misty rugged coastline, pinot noir wineries, and its loyally Blue politics. McCarter lives in the town of La Pine, in the state's rural and more sparsely populated part – the Red side of Oregon. "It's almost like the Grand Canyon goes right along the Cascade Range," he told correspondent Lee Cowan. "It is a big divide."What that means politically, he says, is that the Blue part of Western Oregon always outweighs the Eastern part's Red. "In talking to a legislator over in the Portland area, I said, 'The legislature doesn't listen to our people, our representatives over here.' He said, 'Whoa whoa whoa, stop, Mike. We hear what they're staying. We just out-vote you.'"
So, McCarter decided to look for greener pastures - or in this case, at least ones a little more red. Last fall, when "Sunday Morning" first met McCarter, he was spearheading a campaign called Move Oregon's Border. The group had been busy introducing ballot measures all across the state asking voters about the idea of pushing the urban, Blue bits of Oregon into a smaller but still populous state, and then taking the rural Red bits and creating what would be part of a more expansive Idaho.The group Move Oregon's border advocated for moving the border so that rural counties in Oregon's east would become part of Idaho, a more conservative state. CBS News Sandie Gilson owns a real estate business in rural John Day, Oregon, which is closer to Boise than it is Portland in virtually every way. She told Cowan, "When you have a government that won't listen to the opposition, or take into account those of us that live out here, then we have no government representation."Cowan asked Gilson, "Are you optimistic that you think you have a chance?""I look at it like the American Revolution was a big hurdle to make, and they did it," she replied.
It'd been a year since "Sunday Morning" visited, so Cowan went back, to find out how things stood. Back then, nine counties had voted in favor of considering making Eastern Oregon part of Idaho. Now, that number is up 12, with another set to vote next May. CBS News "We're getting into people's heads about this," McCarter said.As for Idaho, well, it's at least open to discussions. This past spring Idaho's state representatives approved a measure to begin a dialogue with Oregon over whether and how to redraw their common boundary. But so far, McCarter said Oregon is playing hard to get, at least in public. "We've heard from behind the scenes, 'Wait a minute, if we fund a bridge in Eastern Oregon, why would be we do that if it's going to become Idaho?'" he said. But the opposition has swung into gear, too. A Portland non-profit called Western States Center is branding the move a "radical change" that would raise taxes and cut wages. Comparing it to Oregon's past white nationalists hate groups, one ad declares, "Members of Patriot Group, a white nationalist hate group, support a secession. Makes you wonder: Why are violent extremists pushing for secession?"Their message: If rural conservatives don't like Oregon's urban liberal leanings, well, don't move the border, move themselves instead.
McCarter said, "We're not running away from the problem, we're not going to run away and move to Idaho. We're going to deal with the problem right here and now."There are a lot of details still to be ironed out, and the devil is in every one of them. Not to mention the fact that actually changing the border would require both Oregon and Idaho to agree, and would then need approval by the U.S. Congress.Richard Kreitner, author of the book "Break It Up: Secession, Division, and the Secret History of America's Imperfect Union," says it's hardly a new idea: "I don't think that we should act like state lines are written in stone. We should look at them and say, 'Does this actually make sense?' Little, Brown "Secession has always been there. Catholics lived in Maryland, debtors lived in Georgia, you know, Puritans lived in New England. They were kind of separate to begin with. And that's why they wanted nothing to do with one another.""So, it's really woven into our DNA?" asked Cowan. "Absolutely. There's nothing sacred about Oregon. There's nothing sacred about Delaware or my native New Jersey, in my opinion. You know, these are just kind of inherited forms."Mike McCarter will be the first to tell you that moving Oregon's border is radical. But, he says, if we've learned anything about our politics in the last several years, it's that "conventional" seems so yesterday.
"I mean, as fast as things are changing in this country right now, why can't we?" he said. "Why can't people still have the right to vote for who governs them?" For more info:
B | 原标题：“青海拉面”，更名后期待走得更好（四海听音）最近，不少常吃拉面的朋友发现，街角那家吃了多年的“兰州拉面”，悄悄换上了“青海拉面”的新门头。
C | 天津多家拉面馆集体摘下沿用多年的旧招牌，江苏、广东等地也陆续跟进。
D | 一块招牌的更替，引发不少热议：有人觉得突然，有人表示理解，也有人担心改了名就变了味道。说起来，这里面藏着个近40年“借船出海”的故事。一碗面养一家人，一个店带一个村。
E | 青海人把拉面馆开到了全国330多座城市，门店超过3万家，从业人员达到20多万。有人问：好好的招牌，何必折腾？随着产业做大，问题也来了。一个产业做到百亿元规模，却没有属于自己的品牌，品牌效应落不到自身。这场“借船出海”，到了必须“正名”的时刻，与其继续在模糊地带纠缠，不如趁此机会努力打出自己的旗号。换招牌只是结果，功夫其实下在了前头。
F | 2023年，青海就出台《关于促进青海拉面产业高质量发展的指导意见》，明确推行“三店合一”模式，注册“青海拉面”区域公用品牌，将拉面经营店、特色农畜产品展销店、大美青海宣传店融为一体。
G | 顾客进店除了吃面，还能买到牦牛肉、青稞饼干、循化辣椒等青海特产。《青海拉面品质指南》《青海拉面区域品牌培育与建设指南》等地方标准相继发布，从汤料用什么骨头熬、辣椒油用什么品种炼，到品牌怎么建、怎么管，都有明确规范。一碗面，联结起餐饮、农业和文旅3个产业。与此同时，这碗面的“正名”背后，还藏着更大的产业发展目标。2025年2月，青海推出省级区域公共品牌“青海家宴”，覆盖食材供应、特色餐饮、线上销售等环节，将牦牛藏羊、青稞藜麦、祁连黄菇等高原优质食材串联成一套完整的产业图谱。“青海拉面”正是这张产业图谱上一个亮眼的入口，不只是换一块招牌，更是要以一碗面为支点，推动青海特色农产品和文旅资源走向全国乃至世界。从借名求生到立名图强，青海拉面走了条不短的路。近40年前，青海人靠一碗面走出了大山；如今，这碗面正融入省级区域公共品牌，希望能带着高原的原生态食材和多民族的文化底蕴，走向更远、走得更好。
Current article:http://0j2.qiniaohongfangfoguisenzhai.cyou/list_vmmu87q/xnlss4p.html
